Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾Çµ¿ÀÇ Á¡¸·ºñÈÄ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ WATERA¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø°ú Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø ¹× Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþ»çÁøÀÇ Áø´Ü´É ºñ±³

Comparison of Waters' radiography, panoramic radiography, and computed tomography in the diagnosis of antral mucosal thickening

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1998³â 28±Ç 1È£ p.261 ~ 269
Çö¿µ¹Î, À̻Q, ±è¿µ±¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Çö¿µ¹Î (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
À̻Q (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
±è¿µ±¸ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

»ó¾Çµ¿¿¡ Á¡¸·ºñÈÄ ¾ç»óÀ» º¸À̴ ȯÀÚ 16¸íÀÇ Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþ»çÁøÀ» Àý´ë±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© °°Àº
ȯÀÚÀÇ Waters ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¸¸À» Æǵ¶ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿Í Waters ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø°ú Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø
À» µ¿½Ã¿¡ Æǵ¶ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ìÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ, ƯÀ̵µ, Áø´ÜÁ¤È®µµ¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ°í Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±°ú Àü°øÀÚ±º
°ú ºñÀü°øÀÚ±º¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷ÀÌ¿Í »ó¾Çµ¿ °¢ º®¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̸¦ ºñ±³ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·Ð
À» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1) Àü°øÀÚ±º¿¡¼­ Waters¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ, ƯÀ̵µ, Áø´ÜÁ¤È®µµ´Â °¢°¢ 0.7250, 0.8489,
0.7578·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
2) Àü°øÀÚ±º¿¡¼­ ¹Î°¨µµ¿Í Áø´ÜÁ¤È®µµ´Â ºñÀü°øÀÚ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª (P<0.05) ƯÀ̵µ¿¡
´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù (P>0.05).
3) Àü°øÀÚ±ºÀÇ Æ¯À̵µ¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í´Â Àü°øÀÚ±º°ú ºñÀü°øÀÚ±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ Waters¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø
¸¸À» Æǵ¶ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» Âü°í·Î ÇÏ¿© Waters¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀ» Æǵ¶ÇÑ °æ¿ì
¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(P>0.05).
4) ¹Î°¨µµ¿Í Áø´ÜÁ¤È®µµ´Â ³»Ãøº®¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ 0.8163, 0.8271·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ƯÀ̵µ´Â ÈÄ
Ãøº®¿¡¼­ 0.9600À¸·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
5) ÈÄÃøº®°ú »óº®¿¡¼­´Â Àü°øÀÚ±ºÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ¿Í Áø´ÜÁ¤È®µµ°¡ ºñÀü°øÀÚ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ô¾Ò´Ù
(P<0.05).
#ÃÊ·Ï#
With the CT findings as gold standard, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the
diagnostic accuracy of Waters' radiography and Waters' radiography with panoramic
radiography were compared in the diagnosis of antral mucosal thickening of 16 patients.
Three oral radiologists and three non-oral radiologists interpreted the Waters'
radiographs and after 4 weeks, interpreted the Waters' radiographs and panoramic
radiographs simultaneously.
The interpretation point was the existence or the non-existence of the mucosal
thickening on the medial, the posterolateral, the floor, and the roof of maxillary sinus.
The obtained results were as followed :
1. In oral radiologist group, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of
Waters' film were 0.7250, 0.8489 and 0.7578 respectively.
2. The sensitivity and the diagnostic accuracy in oral radiologist group were higher
than those of non-oral radiologist group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference
between two groups in the specificity (P>0.05).
3. There was no significant difference of the diagnostic abilities except the specificity
in oral radiologist group between Waters' radiography and Waters' radiography with
panoramic radiography(P>0.05).
4. The sensitivity and the diagnostic accuracy were the highest in the case of medial
wall interpretation, the specificity was the highest in the posterolateral wall.
5. In the posterolateral wall and the floor, the sensitivity and the diagnostic accuracy
of oral radiologist group were higher than those of non-oral radiologist group (P<0.05).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸